The Nation
February 7, 2008
GAS has been the prime source of energy in Bangladesh. It is used for power generation, as an alternative to petroleum in the transportation sector, in industries such as brickfields and many others including fertiliser industries as basic raw material and in households for cooking and heating. But the recoverable reserves of gas are dwindling down.
This is the outcome of lack of farsightedness on the part of previous governments in giving high priority to exploration to find and develop new gas fields. BAPEX, the lone publicly owned organisation for exploration of oil and gas, was sidelined for long and new reserves could not be located by it through systematic exploration activities. International oil companies (IOCs) operating in Bangladesh also did not do their work with zest for various reasons that meant further slowdown in finding new gas deposits and exploitation of the same.
The cumulative effect of all these is that a crisis like situation now exists in the supply of gas in relation to its fast growing demand. Thus, in this backdrop of fast depleting gas resources, it has become imperative to quickly find out new reserves of gas and produce and supply the same to the national gas grid.
It was learnt recently that government was about to embark on a bidding process to award blocks in its offshore areas to foreign companies for the exploration of gas and oil. The bid documents and all other formalities were reportedly completed and the bidding was expected to start this month. Fast completion of the bidding for offshore blocks and start of operation in them by the foreign companies may lead to substantial production of gas sooner rather than later and ease the conditions which have been created from gas shortages.
The government has reportedly finalised the model of production sharing contracts (PSCs) to ensure that Bangladesh gets better benefits from them compared to the one that was signed for other fields in the past. New difficulties that are reportedly arising in going through the bidding process for the offshore areas like - India and Myanmar laying claims on parts of the exclusive economic zones (EEZ) of Bangladesh in the Bay of Bengal - should be sorted out at the earliest.
However, there is no reason to withhold the bidding process for these dubious claims from India and Myanmar. A large area in the Bangladesh EEG falls outside the disputed zones and this can be immediately awarded to IOCs on a block basis for start of exploration activities. Simultaneously, the issue should be taken up bilaterally with Myanmar and India for the fastest resolution.
Thursday, 7 February 2008
Ethnic groups welcome NLD's invitation for talks
Than Htike Oo and Phanidar
Mizzima News
www.mizzima.com
February 7, 2008 - Chiang Mai– Several ethnic organizations at home and abroad welcomed the invitation of the National League for Democracy (NLD) to all ethnic organizations in Burma, including ceasefire groups, to come and discuss differences in policy matters.
The main opposition for the first time, opened up discussions with ethnic organizations on February 5. The meetings are to focus on any differences between the NLD and ethnic communities regarding a statement issued on November 8, 2007, by NLD leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.
Previously, the Pa-O National Organization, Union Pa-O National League, United Wa State Army, Shan State Special Region (4) Mongla, Kokang, Kachin Defence Army and Shan State Army (North), all ceasefire groups, issued statements saying they did not support Suu Kyi's earlier statement.
"Some ethnic organizations issued statements in state-run newspapers saying they disagreed with this statement. We agree with their statements as they are issued under democratic principles. Similarly, face to face dialogue is also a democratic practice. So we have invited these ethnic organizations, which have different viewpoints on policy from those of the NLD, to come for talks", spokesman Nyan Win said.
But as of yet, no organizations have accepted the invitation, he said.
Some ceasefire groups reportedly said that their statements were issued under pressure and at the behest of the junta. They reportedly were instructed to simply sign pre-prepared statements.
United Nationalities Alliance (UNA) spokesman Pu Sian Tshing Thang said, referring to those organizations that submitted statements opposed to that of Suu Kyi, "I wonder why they protested against Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's statement? Maybe it was not clear what Daw Aung San Suu Kyi said or maybe they acted under pressure of the regime? I think the NLD wants them to clarify their positions. If they have actual differences with the NLD, the NLD would like them to come and discuss those differences with them. This is how I see their statement."
"National reconciliation through dialogue is the best way. Otherwise any resolution through other means will give our country bad results rather than good results. This is my view", Nai Ngwe Thein, Vice-Chairman of the New Mon State Party (NMSP) said. The NMSP has issued public support for Suu Kyi's position.
Meanwhile other groups have yet to respond to Suu Kyi's November statement.
"We haven't yet discussed it, as we were preoccupied with the KIO Revolution Day celebration," said a spokesperson for the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), referring to Suu Kyi's original statement. "We haven't discussed anything yet on the matter and as of yet have no official position. We'll discuss it later when we have a meeting." The KIO is another of the ceasefire groups. Revolution Day is honored on February 5.
Dr. Salai Lianmong Zarkaung, General Secretary of the Ethnic Nationality Council (Burma), which supported Suu Kyi's earlier statement, welcomed the most recent NLD statement and urged ethnic organizations inside Burma to accept the invitation and discuss any differences they have with the NLD.
In all, twelve ethnic organizations, including the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD), Zomi National Congress (ZNC) and Mon National Democracy, previously announced their support for Suu Kyi's statement.
Mizzima News
www.mizzima.com
February 7, 2008 - Chiang Mai– Several ethnic organizations at home and abroad welcomed the invitation of the National League for Democracy (NLD) to all ethnic organizations in Burma, including ceasefire groups, to come and discuss differences in policy matters.
The main opposition for the first time, opened up discussions with ethnic organizations on February 5. The meetings are to focus on any differences between the NLD and ethnic communities regarding a statement issued on November 8, 2007, by NLD leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.
Previously, the Pa-O National Organization, Union Pa-O National League, United Wa State Army, Shan State Special Region (4) Mongla, Kokang, Kachin Defence Army and Shan State Army (North), all ceasefire groups, issued statements saying they did not support Suu Kyi's earlier statement.
"Some ethnic organizations issued statements in state-run newspapers saying they disagreed with this statement. We agree with their statements as they are issued under democratic principles. Similarly, face to face dialogue is also a democratic practice. So we have invited these ethnic organizations, which have different viewpoints on policy from those of the NLD, to come for talks", spokesman Nyan Win said.
But as of yet, no organizations have accepted the invitation, he said.
Some ceasefire groups reportedly said that their statements were issued under pressure and at the behest of the junta. They reportedly were instructed to simply sign pre-prepared statements.
United Nationalities Alliance (UNA) spokesman Pu Sian Tshing Thang said, referring to those organizations that submitted statements opposed to that of Suu Kyi, "I wonder why they protested against Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's statement? Maybe it was not clear what Daw Aung San Suu Kyi said or maybe they acted under pressure of the regime? I think the NLD wants them to clarify their positions. If they have actual differences with the NLD, the NLD would like them to come and discuss those differences with them. This is how I see their statement."
"National reconciliation through dialogue is the best way. Otherwise any resolution through other means will give our country bad results rather than good results. This is my view", Nai Ngwe Thein, Vice-Chairman of the New Mon State Party (NMSP) said. The NMSP has issued public support for Suu Kyi's position.
Meanwhile other groups have yet to respond to Suu Kyi's November statement.
"We haven't yet discussed it, as we were preoccupied with the KIO Revolution Day celebration," said a spokesperson for the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), referring to Suu Kyi's original statement. "We haven't discussed anything yet on the matter and as of yet have no official position. We'll discuss it later when we have a meeting." The KIO is another of the ceasefire groups. Revolution Day is honored on February 5.
Dr. Salai Lianmong Zarkaung, General Secretary of the Ethnic Nationality Council (Burma), which supported Suu Kyi's earlier statement, welcomed the most recent NLD statement and urged ethnic organizations inside Burma to accept the invitation and discuss any differences they have with the NLD.
In all, twelve ethnic organizations, including the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD), Zomi National Congress (ZNC) and Mon National Democracy, previously announced their support for Suu Kyi's statement.
Singapore Resident Targeted In US Myanmar Sanctions -AFP
AFP - Nasdaq
February 7, 2008 SINGAPORE (AFP)--A Singapore resident is among those targeted under new U.S. sanctions aimed at an alleged "henchman" and arms dealer for the Myanmar junta.
U Kyaw Thein, 60, was named Tuesday as the U.S. imposed sanctions against individuals and businesses linked to Tay Za, citing continuing human rights violations and political repression by the Myanmar regime.
A Singaporean company, Pavo Aircraft Leasing Pte Ltd., was also named.
"We are tightening financial sanctions against Tay Za, an arms dealer and financial henchman of Burma's repressive junta," said Adam Szubin, director of the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
An OFAC notice identifies U Kyaw Thein as a citizen of Burma who is a permanent resident of Singapore, with an identity card issued in 2005.
A resident of U Kyaw Thein's Singapore apartment told AFP by phone Thursday that he had gone overseas and could not be reached.
"He's gone for some trip," said the man, who would not give his name.
Pavo Aircraft Leasing is the latest Singapore firm to be hit by the U.S. sanctions.
After Myanmar's deadly suppression of Buddhist-led protests in September, President George W. Bush named three firms with offices in Singapore as among those targeted. They were Pavo Trading Pte Ltd, Air Bagan Holdings Pte Ltd. and Htoo Wood Products Pte Ltd., which is also listed as being from Myanmar's main city, Yangon.
Pavo Aircraft Leasing is listed at the same office where the other three blacklisted firms were based.
The U.S. action freezes any assets they may have under U.S. jurisdiction and bars Americans from conducting business with them at the risk of heavy fines and prison sentences.
Singapore led regional criticism of the junta's September crackdown, but rights activists have accused the city-state of not taking economic action against the regime.
Singapore strongly denies allegations that it allows banks based here to keep illicit funds on behalf of Myanmar's secretive generals.
February 7, 2008 SINGAPORE (AFP)--A Singapore resident is among those targeted under new U.S. sanctions aimed at an alleged "henchman" and arms dealer for the Myanmar junta.
U Kyaw Thein, 60, was named Tuesday as the U.S. imposed sanctions against individuals and businesses linked to Tay Za, citing continuing human rights violations and political repression by the Myanmar regime.
A Singaporean company, Pavo Aircraft Leasing Pte Ltd., was also named.
"We are tightening financial sanctions against Tay Za, an arms dealer and financial henchman of Burma's repressive junta," said Adam Szubin, director of the Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control.
An OFAC notice identifies U Kyaw Thein as a citizen of Burma who is a permanent resident of Singapore, with an identity card issued in 2005.
A resident of U Kyaw Thein's Singapore apartment told AFP by phone Thursday that he had gone overseas and could not be reached.
"He's gone for some trip," said the man, who would not give his name.
Pavo Aircraft Leasing is the latest Singapore firm to be hit by the U.S. sanctions.
After Myanmar's deadly suppression of Buddhist-led protests in September, President George W. Bush named three firms with offices in Singapore as among those targeted. They were Pavo Trading Pte Ltd, Air Bagan Holdings Pte Ltd. and Htoo Wood Products Pte Ltd., which is also listed as being from Myanmar's main city, Yangon.
Pavo Aircraft Leasing is listed at the same office where the other three blacklisted firms were based.
The U.S. action freezes any assets they may have under U.S. jurisdiction and bars Americans from conducting business with them at the risk of heavy fines and prison sentences.
Singapore led regional criticism of the junta's September crackdown, but rights activists have accused the city-state of not taking economic action against the regime.
Singapore strongly denies allegations that it allows banks based here to keep illicit funds on behalf of Myanmar's secretive generals.
Burmese Junta needed for transition
By Gamanii
The killing of the highest spiritual leaders of the society is the expression of most severe form of lawlessness.
Burma: The Golden Alternative, Not Abrupt Regime Change but Negotiated Settlement
February 7, 2008 - As Burma gets into world spotlight with the Saffron Revolution, lots of arguments against democratization are surprisingly heard from many quarter-¬politicians, statesmen, scholars, so-called Burma experts and even some Burmese in exile who have never set foot on the native soil or who have been out of touch with reality for decades¬ absurdly claiming that the substitute for the military junta will be, out of all things, the devil's alternative. One argument is the likelihood of lawlessness, chaos and 'Balkanization' if the junta is gone. So what's the situation now? Isn't there lawlessness already in Burma? There has to be a negotiated settlement and no quick fixes.
The killing of the highest spiritual leaders of the society is the expression of most severe form of lawlessness. On the other hand, the leaders of the Saffron Revolution, the monks, have shown the highest and unrivalled form of discipline and order in the world. Buddhism is renowned for its peace-loving and love-radiating attributes and Burmese monks and the demonstrating people led by them have again proved it. Drug cartels and crime syndicates flourish most under egomaniac despotism. There is no rule of law in Burma; only the words of selfish generals. This is the best culture for crime and chaos.
The self-seeking military junta is the sole cause of chaos and civil war. Incompetent junta's militarization of the country has brought it to 'Least Developed Country' Status in 1987 and, twenty years later, unprecedented chaos, mismanagement and social conflict matched only by few failed states on earth. Now it is trying to implement a so-called Road Map which will without doubt further the degeneration and polarization, producing a military dynasty like Duvalier's Haiti, Kim Il-Sung's North Korea or Assad's Syria after Than Shwe's demise or when the present generation of generals have gone.
On the opposition side, all the main groups have more or less the same major demands or visions. Democratic forces led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi of the National League for Democracy (NLD) and ethnic forces led by the Union Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD) or United Nationalities Alliance (UNA) are united in the Committee Representing People's Parliament (CRPP) formed in 1998 by major parties elected in 1990. The bond was first brought about through Bo Aung Kyaw Street Declaration in 1990 August. The ceasefire groups are also linked to the UNA and through it to the CRPP which was openly supported by four armed ceasefire groups in 1998. One of the reasons behind the detentions of Khun Tun Oo, leader of the strongest legal Shan political party, and Gen. Hso Ten, leader of the strongest armed Shan (ceasefire) force, in 2005 is that they are the principal influential links between the ethnic ceasefire groups and the CRPP.
In 1990 elections the NLD and the UNLD won 95% of parliamentary seats. The NLD also won in many ethnic areas. During Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's tours in 2003 the largest turnout of support occurred in ethnic states. This is one reason behind the junta's infamous Depayin attack on her. The NLD had also won in military cantonment areas in 1990. The president and vice-president of the NLD are former military generals in addition to many 'enlightened' ex-commanders and soldiers who are now serving in the country's biggest opposition party. So it is evident that democratization will unify rather than balkanize the country.
Underground opposition groups have also achieved important accords in 1992 July through Manerplaw Agreement and in 1997 January through Maethrawhta Agreement which was hailed by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi as a right step towards peace and harmony in future Burma. These pacts are also significant for their agreement to solve any differences among democratic or armed ethnic groups by means of peaceful negotiations and concept of equality.
Almost all the underground ethnic and democratic forces are united inside the National Council of the Union of Burma (NCUB) which comprises of 10 armed ethnic groups, 5 unarmed ethnic or minority groups and 13 democratic or civil society groups (including the exiled-NLD and Students' Army) as well as 34 exiled parliamentarians from the NLD, the pro-military National Unity Party (NUP) and seven ethnic parties elected in 1990. Ethnic groups and democratic or civil society groups outside the NCUB are linked to or interrelated with the latter through exiled-UNLD, Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC), Five-Party Military Alliance and Forum for Democracy in Burma (FDB).
To bring order during the transitional period the National League for Democracy has a provisional Constitution based to some extent on 1947 Constitution in addition to plans for a second Panglong Conference of all ethnic groups including the Burman majority. The first Panglong Agreement of 1947 had brought understanding among ethnic nationalities of Burma and founded the present Union though not much in essence. The opposition forces in exile are also working on future constitutions through a highly inclusive and broad-based Federal Constitution Drafting and Co-ordination Committee (FCDCC) and various State Constitutions Drafting Committees (SCDCs), extensively smoothing out potential divergences and conflicts.
Unlike Yugoslavia or African countries, more than 2000-year old civilized Burma's history bore no precedence of Balkanization. Bloody religious or racial conflicts common to Yugoslavia or African countries were unheard of. Past wars were caused mainly by feudal monarchs annexing adjacent territories just like feudal rulers of any country in ancient times. Pre- and Post-Independence communal riots were the hangover of colonialist era 'divide and rule' policy. The junta's disinformation on the meaning of federalism has failed among the Burmese people. Burmans who usually turned out victors through military might have now realized the futility of denying other ethnic peoples their rights in accordance with universal norms; the only remaining obstacle being the military junta.
The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples adopted in September 2007 will give a great boost to democratic and ethnic issue in Burma. Another thing to take note is that there are no 135 races in Burma as the junta claims; the true figure is around sixty with most of them less than 50,000 each.
Of course, as in Quebec, Scotland or Flanders, there is and will always be a few who desire secession but majority of each ethnic population only cares for equal rights. Besides, there are no practical means or situation to carry out secession by those who desire it. Even under Prime Minister U Nu in 1958, when ethnics could utilize the Article 140 of the 1947 Constitution to secede legally, no attempt was made but only demands for more rights within the Union framework were presented peacefully and democratically that were but turned down by Ne Win's military junta using brute force.
Armed ethnic groups, particularly ceasefire armies and the people in their territories are basically war-weary. That's why the SPDC is able to coerce and manipulate them. In 1998 September, when some ceasefire groups backed the CRPP in defiance of the junta, local civilian pressure and senior ethnic officers' war-fatigue prompted the groups to back down from war. The concept of non-violence and effects of media which have dominated the world since the end of Cold War have been influencing the armed ethnic groups more than its worth. In Burma, (tripartite) dialogue and non-violence rather than warring are the buzz words.
Balkanization is not the only option in the world; Czechoslovakia had experienced a peaceful 'velvet separation'. Balkanization and anarchy can only be brought about by a freely failing junta which could break apart into multiple rivaling fiefdoms controlled separately by warlord-turned junta generals or Burma army's regional commanders as in post-Siad Barre Somalia, post-Najibullah Afghanistan or post-Mobutu Congo. Unlike them, Burma fortunately has a legitimate and popular democratic leadership well-prepared and highly competent to take over.
Burma's opposition leaders ¬both democratic and ethnic ¬are undoubtedly more competent, qualified and broad-minded than the junta chiefs. Unlike Iraq or Afghanistan, all the atrocities and terror in Burma are work of the SPDC. Tthere are no extremists or terrorists among the opposition. Hence merely checking and removing the SPDC will prevent any further bloodshed.
Presently, junta's senseless or paranoid economic policies are making everyone broke except the generals. Even Singapore's senior statesman Mr. Lee Kuan-yew has dubbed them 'dumb' with regard to economics. No globalization beneficial to the country's people, local businessmen or foreign investors could take hold in Burma. In contrast, the National League for Democracy has been upgrading its leaders and rank-and-file with world level capacity in all issues, anticipating to ride the globalization surf like China and Vietnam. Exiled democratic and ethnic forces are also versed in international efficiencies of peaceful nature after years of training and studying abroad.
The important thing is that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD are not calling for abrupt 'regime change' but rather a negotiated settlement taking into account the Burmese military's role, and finally replacing it definitely in not too distant future. In 2006 February, the NLD offered a transition plan which would recognize the military junta as a de jure government for a transition period that would be legitimized by the parliament elected in 1990. Also in August, 2007, ninety-two elected members of parliament proposed an alternative Road Map offering the SPDC a considerable role in Constitution-drafting and transition processes along with elected NLD and ethnic members of parliament. "Everything is negotiable," Daw Aung San Suu Kyi has said.
The army is to be retained but the military dictatorship must go, this is the opposition's consensus. The pigheaded generals simply turned down all the proposals. These meaningful proposals are far from those clamors for pointless 'gradual change' advocated by unwitting apologists of the obstinate military junta who has been claiming they are executing gradual change for nineteen years which has only resulted in the massacre of Buddhist monks. The junta's gradual change is in fact no change at all but more bloodshed only.
Engagement with the junta has also been called or initiated by many countries including ASEAN, China and Japan who only got its reporter Mr. Nagai killed from close range gunshot during the Saffron Revolution. There has been the Chilston Park seminar in the UK favoring engagement as well. All these has resulted in more deadly militarization with more refugees and more migrants to neighboring countries not to say of diseases, forced labor, rape and more IDPs in the country.
So what can you expect from shoring up a junta that is prepared to kill the most revered section of the nation at the country's holiest shrine on a full-moon day which is regarded as a holy day in Buddhism? Will it be moral or feasible to maintain the status quo or engage with this kind of junta to prevent an imaginary and improbable Balkanization and chaos? To prevent such a scenario there is no other way rather than to replace the regime with the opposition who has people's mandate, through the road map initiated by the latter.
Gamanii is a former student activist and political prisoner of 1974-1975 and then joined ethnic armed groups and spent twenty years in the jungle fighting the military regime. Now, he is working for Burma's exiled government (NCGUB). He has written many articles on Burma. He is an Inthar, an ethnic minority group in Shan State of Burma.
Source: Asian Tribune
The killing of the highest spiritual leaders of the society is the expression of most severe form of lawlessness.
Burma: The Golden Alternative, Not Abrupt Regime Change but Negotiated Settlement
February 7, 2008 - As Burma gets into world spotlight with the Saffron Revolution, lots of arguments against democratization are surprisingly heard from many quarter-¬politicians, statesmen, scholars, so-called Burma experts and even some Burmese in exile who have never set foot on the native soil or who have been out of touch with reality for decades¬ absurdly claiming that the substitute for the military junta will be, out of all things, the devil's alternative. One argument is the likelihood of lawlessness, chaos and 'Balkanization' if the junta is gone. So what's the situation now? Isn't there lawlessness already in Burma? There has to be a negotiated settlement and no quick fixes.
The killing of the highest spiritual leaders of the society is the expression of most severe form of lawlessness. On the other hand, the leaders of the Saffron Revolution, the monks, have shown the highest and unrivalled form of discipline and order in the world. Buddhism is renowned for its peace-loving and love-radiating attributes and Burmese monks and the demonstrating people led by them have again proved it. Drug cartels and crime syndicates flourish most under egomaniac despotism. There is no rule of law in Burma; only the words of selfish generals. This is the best culture for crime and chaos.
The self-seeking military junta is the sole cause of chaos and civil war. Incompetent junta's militarization of the country has brought it to 'Least Developed Country' Status in 1987 and, twenty years later, unprecedented chaos, mismanagement and social conflict matched only by few failed states on earth. Now it is trying to implement a so-called Road Map which will without doubt further the degeneration and polarization, producing a military dynasty like Duvalier's Haiti, Kim Il-Sung's North Korea or Assad's Syria after Than Shwe's demise or when the present generation of generals have gone.
On the opposition side, all the main groups have more or less the same major demands or visions. Democratic forces led by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi of the National League for Democracy (NLD) and ethnic forces led by the Union Nationalities League for Democracy (UNLD) or United Nationalities Alliance (UNA) are united in the Committee Representing People's Parliament (CRPP) formed in 1998 by major parties elected in 1990. The bond was first brought about through Bo Aung Kyaw Street Declaration in 1990 August. The ceasefire groups are also linked to the UNA and through it to the CRPP which was openly supported by four armed ceasefire groups in 1998. One of the reasons behind the detentions of Khun Tun Oo, leader of the strongest legal Shan political party, and Gen. Hso Ten, leader of the strongest armed Shan (ceasefire) force, in 2005 is that they are the principal influential links between the ethnic ceasefire groups and the CRPP.
In 1990 elections the NLD and the UNLD won 95% of parliamentary seats. The NLD also won in many ethnic areas. During Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's tours in 2003 the largest turnout of support occurred in ethnic states. This is one reason behind the junta's infamous Depayin attack on her. The NLD had also won in military cantonment areas in 1990. The president and vice-president of the NLD are former military generals in addition to many 'enlightened' ex-commanders and soldiers who are now serving in the country's biggest opposition party. So it is evident that democratization will unify rather than balkanize the country.
Underground opposition groups have also achieved important accords in 1992 July through Manerplaw Agreement and in 1997 January through Maethrawhta Agreement which was hailed by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi as a right step towards peace and harmony in future Burma. These pacts are also significant for their agreement to solve any differences among democratic or armed ethnic groups by means of peaceful negotiations and concept of equality.
Almost all the underground ethnic and democratic forces are united inside the National Council of the Union of Burma (NCUB) which comprises of 10 armed ethnic groups, 5 unarmed ethnic or minority groups and 13 democratic or civil society groups (including the exiled-NLD and Students' Army) as well as 34 exiled parliamentarians from the NLD, the pro-military National Unity Party (NUP) and seven ethnic parties elected in 1990. Ethnic groups and democratic or civil society groups outside the NCUB are linked to or interrelated with the latter through exiled-UNLD, Ethnic Nationalities Council (ENC), Five-Party Military Alliance and Forum for Democracy in Burma (FDB).
To bring order during the transitional period the National League for Democracy has a provisional Constitution based to some extent on 1947 Constitution in addition to plans for a second Panglong Conference of all ethnic groups including the Burman majority. The first Panglong Agreement of 1947 had brought understanding among ethnic nationalities of Burma and founded the present Union though not much in essence. The opposition forces in exile are also working on future constitutions through a highly inclusive and broad-based Federal Constitution Drafting and Co-ordination Committee (FCDCC) and various State Constitutions Drafting Committees (SCDCs), extensively smoothing out potential divergences and conflicts.
Unlike Yugoslavia or African countries, more than 2000-year old civilized Burma's history bore no precedence of Balkanization. Bloody religious or racial conflicts common to Yugoslavia or African countries were unheard of. Past wars were caused mainly by feudal monarchs annexing adjacent territories just like feudal rulers of any country in ancient times. Pre- and Post-Independence communal riots were the hangover of colonialist era 'divide and rule' policy. The junta's disinformation on the meaning of federalism has failed among the Burmese people. Burmans who usually turned out victors through military might have now realized the futility of denying other ethnic peoples their rights in accordance with universal norms; the only remaining obstacle being the military junta.
The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples adopted in September 2007 will give a great boost to democratic and ethnic issue in Burma. Another thing to take note is that there are no 135 races in Burma as the junta claims; the true figure is around sixty with most of them less than 50,000 each.
Of course, as in Quebec, Scotland or Flanders, there is and will always be a few who desire secession but majority of each ethnic population only cares for equal rights. Besides, there are no practical means or situation to carry out secession by those who desire it. Even under Prime Minister U Nu in 1958, when ethnics could utilize the Article 140 of the 1947 Constitution to secede legally, no attempt was made but only demands for more rights within the Union framework were presented peacefully and democratically that were but turned down by Ne Win's military junta using brute force.
Armed ethnic groups, particularly ceasefire armies and the people in their territories are basically war-weary. That's why the SPDC is able to coerce and manipulate them. In 1998 September, when some ceasefire groups backed the CRPP in defiance of the junta, local civilian pressure and senior ethnic officers' war-fatigue prompted the groups to back down from war. The concept of non-violence and effects of media which have dominated the world since the end of Cold War have been influencing the armed ethnic groups more than its worth. In Burma, (tripartite) dialogue and non-violence rather than warring are the buzz words.
Balkanization is not the only option in the world; Czechoslovakia had experienced a peaceful 'velvet separation'. Balkanization and anarchy can only be brought about by a freely failing junta which could break apart into multiple rivaling fiefdoms controlled separately by warlord-turned junta generals or Burma army's regional commanders as in post-Siad Barre Somalia, post-Najibullah Afghanistan or post-Mobutu Congo. Unlike them, Burma fortunately has a legitimate and popular democratic leadership well-prepared and highly competent to take over.
Burma's opposition leaders ¬both democratic and ethnic ¬are undoubtedly more competent, qualified and broad-minded than the junta chiefs. Unlike Iraq or Afghanistan, all the atrocities and terror in Burma are work of the SPDC. Tthere are no extremists or terrorists among the opposition. Hence merely checking and removing the SPDC will prevent any further bloodshed.
Presently, junta's senseless or paranoid economic policies are making everyone broke except the generals. Even Singapore's senior statesman Mr. Lee Kuan-yew has dubbed them 'dumb' with regard to economics. No globalization beneficial to the country's people, local businessmen or foreign investors could take hold in Burma. In contrast, the National League for Democracy has been upgrading its leaders and rank-and-file with world level capacity in all issues, anticipating to ride the globalization surf like China and Vietnam. Exiled democratic and ethnic forces are also versed in international efficiencies of peaceful nature after years of training and studying abroad.
The important thing is that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD are not calling for abrupt 'regime change' but rather a negotiated settlement taking into account the Burmese military's role, and finally replacing it definitely in not too distant future. In 2006 February, the NLD offered a transition plan which would recognize the military junta as a de jure government for a transition period that would be legitimized by the parliament elected in 1990. Also in August, 2007, ninety-two elected members of parliament proposed an alternative Road Map offering the SPDC a considerable role in Constitution-drafting and transition processes along with elected NLD and ethnic members of parliament. "Everything is negotiable," Daw Aung San Suu Kyi has said.
The army is to be retained but the military dictatorship must go, this is the opposition's consensus. The pigheaded generals simply turned down all the proposals. These meaningful proposals are far from those clamors for pointless 'gradual change' advocated by unwitting apologists of the obstinate military junta who has been claiming they are executing gradual change for nineteen years which has only resulted in the massacre of Buddhist monks. The junta's gradual change is in fact no change at all but more bloodshed only.
Engagement with the junta has also been called or initiated by many countries including ASEAN, China and Japan who only got its reporter Mr. Nagai killed from close range gunshot during the Saffron Revolution. There has been the Chilston Park seminar in the UK favoring engagement as well. All these has resulted in more deadly militarization with more refugees and more migrants to neighboring countries not to say of diseases, forced labor, rape and more IDPs in the country.
So what can you expect from shoring up a junta that is prepared to kill the most revered section of the nation at the country's holiest shrine on a full-moon day which is regarded as a holy day in Buddhism? Will it be moral or feasible to maintain the status quo or engage with this kind of junta to prevent an imaginary and improbable Balkanization and chaos? To prevent such a scenario there is no other way rather than to replace the regime with the opposition who has people's mandate, through the road map initiated by the latter.
Gamanii is a former student activist and political prisoner of 1974-1975 and then joined ethnic armed groups and spent twenty years in the jungle fighting the military regime. Now, he is working for Burma's exiled government (NCGUB). He has written many articles on Burma. He is an Inthar, an ethnic minority group in Shan State of Burma.
Source: Asian Tribune
39 youth abducted by rebels, taken to Burma
By MANOJ ANAND - Asian Age
Guwahati, February 6, 2008: NSCN (K) rebels are alleged to have abducted 39 youth from Tirap district of Arunachal Pradesh and to have taken them to training camps in Burma.
However, at least six of them are said to have returned, but they are not in a position to say anything about their abduction or subsequent release.
The powerful All-Arunachal Pradesh Students’ Union has threatened to launch a movement if the state government fails to secure the return of the abducted youth at the earliest.
Security sources said the youth were kidnapped on January 21 and are said to have been taken to the outfit’s hideouts and training camps across the border in Burma. Arunachal Pradesh chief minister Dorjee Khandu has sought Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s urgent intervention for their early release. Mr K.D. Singh, the principal secretary to the Arunachal Pradesh chief minister, on Wednesday issued a press release at Itanagar saying that the chief minister has taken up the matter with the Prime Minister.
The Arunachal Pradesh chief minister, in his message to the Prime Minister, said it is a matter of grave concern that militants are able to operate with impunity despite the district being declared "disturbed" under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act.
Mr Khandu has also taken up the matter with national security adviser M.K. Narayanan and Maj. Gen. Jitender Singh, GOC 2nd Division, in Tinsukia. He has informed them that the kidnapped youth have reportedly been taken to the outfit’s hideouts and training camps in Burma.
Since this issue assumes international dimension, it is beyond the means of the state government to deal with the problem, the release said. The return of the youth may not be possible unless Burma is asked to drive the separatist group out of its territory, he added. Mr Khandu said this has also severely eroded the people’s faith in the government and that it is high time that a concerted effort is made to ensure their release.
The abduction of so many youth came to light soon Arunachal Pradesh governor J.J. Singh visited the district headquarters last Sunday. No senior police officer in the state was available for comment while Arunachal director-general of police Ajay Chadha was in New Delhi.
Meanwhile, the general secretary of the powerful Northeast Students’ Organisation, Mr Gunjan Haider, told this newspaper that most of those taken by NSCN (K) rebels are school students. "We have set a deadline of 10 days for the government to secure the release of those kidnapped. If the government fails to do so, we students of Arunachal Pradesh will launch a vigorous movement in the state," said Mr Haider.
Talking over the telephone from Itanagar, Mr Haider said they have also sought the intervention of the Arunachal Pradesh governor to ensure that the militants release these boys. He, however, denied the report that some students have come back. "We are in touch with people in Tirap district. All 39 students are still traceless," asserted Mr Haider.
Guwahati, February 6, 2008: NSCN (K) rebels are alleged to have abducted 39 youth from Tirap district of Arunachal Pradesh and to have taken them to training camps in Burma.
However, at least six of them are said to have returned, but they are not in a position to say anything about their abduction or subsequent release.
The powerful All-Arunachal Pradesh Students’ Union has threatened to launch a movement if the state government fails to secure the return of the abducted youth at the earliest.
Security sources said the youth were kidnapped on January 21 and are said to have been taken to the outfit’s hideouts and training camps across the border in Burma. Arunachal Pradesh chief minister Dorjee Khandu has sought Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s urgent intervention for their early release. Mr K.D. Singh, the principal secretary to the Arunachal Pradesh chief minister, on Wednesday issued a press release at Itanagar saying that the chief minister has taken up the matter with the Prime Minister.
The Arunachal Pradesh chief minister, in his message to the Prime Minister, said it is a matter of grave concern that militants are able to operate with impunity despite the district being declared "disturbed" under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act.
Mr Khandu has also taken up the matter with national security adviser M.K. Narayanan and Maj. Gen. Jitender Singh, GOC 2nd Division, in Tinsukia. He has informed them that the kidnapped youth have reportedly been taken to the outfit’s hideouts and training camps in Burma.
Since this issue assumes international dimension, it is beyond the means of the state government to deal with the problem, the release said. The return of the youth may not be possible unless Burma is asked to drive the separatist group out of its territory, he added. Mr Khandu said this has also severely eroded the people’s faith in the government and that it is high time that a concerted effort is made to ensure their release.
The abduction of so many youth came to light soon Arunachal Pradesh governor J.J. Singh visited the district headquarters last Sunday. No senior police officer in the state was available for comment while Arunachal director-general of police Ajay Chadha was in New Delhi.
Meanwhile, the general secretary of the powerful Northeast Students’ Organisation, Mr Gunjan Haider, told this newspaper that most of those taken by NSCN (K) rebels are school students. "We have set a deadline of 10 days for the government to secure the release of those kidnapped. If the government fails to do so, we students of Arunachal Pradesh will launch a vigorous movement in the state," said Mr Haider.
Talking over the telephone from Itanagar, Mr Haider said they have also sought the intervention of the Arunachal Pradesh governor to ensure that the militants release these boys. He, however, denied the report that some students have come back. "We are in touch with people in Tirap district. All 39 students are still traceless," asserted Mr Haider.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)